An August Night

•September 29, 2013 • Leave a Comment

It is hard to know what to say about death. Words are often dry and inadequate. But one poet, whose own recent death leaves the world the poorer, approached the topic with more adequacy than most. So many of Seamus Heaney’s poems of recent years delve into gaps and moments of memory, as a way perhaps of keeping alive the dead, or of trying to let them go. His method was less grand than Yeats’s summoning ghosts, and sidles up to its subject by sometimes the most unluminous of details. This warm and small moon poem, probably concerning the poet’s father, is imagist in brevity but somehow contains more overflowing subjective feeling than many imagist glimpses. Taken from the collection Seeing Things (1991), it is I think quietly making a claim about certain kinds of seeing, when as here a memory turns strange, and fittingly luminous.

An August Night

His hands were warm and small and knowledgeable
When I saw them again last night, they were two ferrets,
Playing all by themselves in a moonlit field.

Seamus Heaney (1939-2013)

Parallax

•August 2, 2013 • Leave a Comment

The following moon poem comes from a new collection called Parallax, from the Northern Irish poet Sinead Morrissey, published this summer by Carcanet. It is such a thoughtful poem I hope I might be forgiven for including it here:

1801

A beautiful cloudless morning. My toothache better.
William at work on The Pedlar. Miss Gell
left a basket of excellent lettuces; I shelled
our scarlet beans. Walked out after dinner for letters—
met a man who had once been a Captain begging for alms.

                                    *

The afternoon airy and warm. No letters. Came home
via the lake, which was near-turquoise
& startled by summer geese.
The soles on this year’s boots are getting worn.
Heard a tiny wounded yellow bird, sounding its alarm.

                                    *

William as pale as a basin, exhausted with altering…
I boiled up pears with cloves.
Such visited evenings are sharp with love
I almost said dear, look. Either moonlight on Grasmere

—like herrings!—

or the new moon holding the old moon in its arms.

This poem opens the collection, after an epigraph defining the overall title ‘parallax’ drawn from the OED. It’s not hard to think then that the volume, and the poem, should be concerned with differences in position of the point of observation, and how this affects the things we see. Observing an object from different points and measuring the tiny differences in angle is how we tell how far away something is: vital for astronomy, but also for our everyday lives. Humans’ depth perception works because we have two eyes of different positions able to look at the same object – and if you’ve ever tried to play ping pong with one eye closed you’ll appreciate its importance. Parallax, parallaxis or alteration in Greek, has some historical associations with Ireland: Leopold Bloom muses on the term in James Joyce’s Ulysses, while Dougal in Father Ted is given an important lesson about how some sheep appear small, but are in fact just far away. Maybe the title is there to remind us that things which loom large might just happen to be near to us – and things which appear small might be of undiscerned and surprising importance. And making these kinds of observations and judgements can indeed be seen as the purview of the poet.

Accordingly the first line of the poem does juxtapose things far and near. Associating as it does a beautiful cloudless morning and a toothache it throws together, with faint comic timing, a classic poetical observation and a (too?) intimate personal detail. The tone is allowed because we are overhearing Dorothy Wordsworth noting down observations in her journal. We know this because she says her brother William is at work on ‘The Pedlar’, a poem itself concerned with far and near and autobiographical reflection. But although quirky, the catholicity of Dorothy Wordsworth’s observations seem to be part of the point – to the extent (with their short sentences and shorthand &s) they make the poem we are reading live, they are an example for poets to follow. William’s weary corrections on a poem never completed to his satisfaction mean, for the time being at least, he misses the kind of things a poet might be expected to notice. The poem seems to subscribe to the idea that Dorothy Wordsworth was as much a poet as her brother, something any reader of her Journal (OUP, 1991, mentioned in the collection’s notes), would find convincing. ‘Parallax’ then implies the existence of a male and female perspective; perhaps in the relative attention given to small things, but also in the relative scrutiny their work has attracted (even by the devoted Dorothy Wordsworth herself).

All of which makes the title of the poem interesting. For any Irish poet to title a poem with a date implicitly associates it with other dated poems – from the rousing national ballad ‘Who fears to speak of ’Ninety-Eight’ to Yeats’s extraordinary trinity of poems ‘September 1913’, ‘Easter 1916’, ‘Nineteen Hundred and Nineteen’, all of them concerned with sometime violent public events and the value of art. This poem’s date, 1801, is more readily associated with the Act of Union between Great Britain and Ireland, and all of the troubles that came after. Again though the poem ‘1801’ reminds us there were other things happening in 1801 – and that if we look again we might see them, in their ability to alter consciousness, as of equal, or even greater importance. If even William Wordsworth didn’t quite see this – ‘dear, look’ – we’ll have quite a bit of work ahead of us to do so. Reading this most carefully observed volume might be a good start.

So to the moon, the thing we are directed to observe. Pale as a basin, William Wordsworth is perhaps also a little moony, but presumably doesn’t actually see this moon as Dorothy does not in the end direct him: ‘I almost said dear, look’. We do, though, and twice: the surprising ‘herrings!’ I have to imagine as moonlight playing on the lake water (rather than ‘lapping with low sounds by the shore’ as in Yeats’s ‘The Lake Isle of Innisfree’), and the observation of the last line is so beautiful and surprising and yet inevitable it perhaps needs little comment. Still, O yes: as the nearest big thing to the earth, the moon attracts the largest maximum parallax of any celestial body. We can observe the moon from different ends of the earth, high above or on the horizon, and unlike for the faraway stars such angles of parallax are easily measurable, as much as one degree. Lunar parallax in particular not only tells how far away the moon is but something about ourselves. My Australian-born mother always remembers being surprised that it was not just a story but northern hemisphere moons actually do seem to have a man in them: to see him smiling in the southern hemisphere you have to turn upside down and look between your legs. So there really are more ways to see the moon than anything else in the heavens, especially if you see it in a lake; which indeed the moon’s position as an inveterate poetic symbol for so many things would suggest. It would be daft then to try to pin down the symbolism of the poem’s final line, which suggests something generative, cradling. Only that not simply concerning this moon but as a whole, both poem and collection certainly remind us to look at things differently. Poetry though is not just about our own observation: and Parallax is carefully framed and focussed to show us there is always more than one view.

Dark leopards of the moon

•February 17, 2013 • Leave a Comment

A lesser-known moon poem from a poet nonetheless well known for his poems about moons. Despite the deliciously mock-decorous tone of ‘those most noble ladies’ the title and the closing lines make it clear this is an impassioned lament about the vanishing of the images and visions and creatures of the imagination. On the other hand the loose unravelling lines prophesy a coming freedom – and control – in the poet’s verse.

Lines Written in Dejection

When have I last looked on
The round green eyes and the long wavering bodies
Of the dark leopards of the moon?
All the wild witches, those most notable ladies,
For all their broom-sticks and their tears,
Their angry tears, are gone.
The holy centaurs of the hills are vanished;
I have nothing but the embittered sun;
Banished heroic mother moon and vanished,
And now that I have come to fifty years
I must endure the timid sun.

W.B.Yeats (1915)

Play

•August 31, 2012 • Leave a Comment

This moon poem is so seeming small but with such an open heart that to say too much might disturb it. All that should be noted then is that it was written by T.E.Hulme, friend of Ezra Pound and avatar of the imagist movement. The play it describes must have been I think all the same rather consequent and solemn.

Above the Dock

Above the quiet dock in mid night
Tangled in the tall mast’s corded height,
Hangs the moon. What seemed so far away
Is but a child’s balloon, forgotten after play.

A Lunar Baedeker

•July 1, 2012 • Leave a Comment

Mina Loy is a poet not quite like anyone else. She seems to have had at least four careers and nine lives. Still, her weirdly worded strange (and estranged) geographies penetrate places other poems don’t reach, and in this anticipate Elizabeth Bishop without sounding at all like her. Hardly surprising: she writes as if in a foreign language; from the far side of the moon. Where better then to look for poems about the moon than in The Lost Lunar Baedeker (Carcanet, 1996, ed. Roger Conover), which contains the best (and most openly, consistently edited) selection of her poems. The edition is like some of her poems, with the working on the outside.

I can’t make up my mind if the following moon poem is profound or mischievous. But then, it is perhaps as contradictory a poem as its contradictory parts, holding incompatibles in humorous tensions: ‘unendurable ease’, ‘thermal icicles’, and ‘inverse dawn’ (a dusk?).  Nor do I know what might lie beneath those three em dashes. Maybe they are naughty. Maybe not. This too makes them rather like the poem.

Moreover, the Moon –– –– ––

Face of the skies
preside
over our wonder.

Fluorescent
truant of heaven
draw us under.

Silver, circular corpse
your decease
infects us with unendurable ease,

touching nerve-terminals
to thermal icicles

Coercive as coma, frail as bloom
innuendoes of your inverse dawn
suffuse the self;
our every corpuscle become an elf.

Alla luna

•February 20, 2012 • Leave a Comment

Giacomo Leopardi was born three years after Keats in 1798, and died in the same year as Pushkin, in 1837. The feeling of his time made him a thoroughgoing Romantic, but he had a Classicist’s attention to the ancient past. The moon contained for him therefore manifold and venerable associations lurking in shadows; so landscapes flooded by moonlight feature in many of his poems. None does so however so simply and touchingly as in the following lyric ‘Alla Luna’. This seems to have begun life as a sonnet, but on reflection the last two lines were added. I couldn’t find a translation, quite, that I liked; I wanted to keep the last two lines intact. So I attempted one of my own, which appears below.

Alla luna

O graziosa luna, io mi rammento
Che, or volge l’anno, sovra questo colle
Io venia pien d’angoscia a rimirarti:
E tu pendevi allor su quella selva
Siccome or fai, che tutta la rischiari.
Ma nebuloso e tremulo dal pianto
Che mi sorgea sul ciglio, alle mie luci
Il tuo volto apparia, che travagliosa
Era mia vita: ed è, né cangia stile,
0 mia diletta luna. E pur mi giova
La ricordanza, e il noverar l’etate
Del mio dolore. Oh come grato occorre
Nel tempo giovanil, quando ancor lungo
La speme e breve ha la memoria il corso,
Il rimembrar delle passate cose,
Ancor che triste, e che l’affanno duri!

To the Moon

O moon of grace, I remember how,
One year gone, climbing this hilltop
I came to gaze on you in anguish:
And you hung silent over that wood,
Just as now, filling all with light.
But trembling and clouded by tears
That burst out from my eyelashes
Your face appeared, so troubled was my
Life; and still, so little changes,
O my sweet moon. And yet I’m ravished
By recollection, and reckoning up
The ages of my pain. How sweet to think
Of when we were young, when long on hope
And short on memory, time waited –
The remembrance of things past –
Though things were sad, and troubles last.

First Love

•November 23, 2011 • Leave a Comment

Yeats is really the master of moon poetry. There are so many moon poems to choose from it seems  just to pick one. Much of his philosophical systematizing was based on the moon’s cycle, which produced poems as different as the violent ‘Blood and the Moon’, and the quiet, insinuating ‘The Cat and the Moon’, which compares the crescent moon to a cat’s pupils. He had begun mooning much earlier, of course, and in successive versions of ‘The Sorrow of Love’ its moon changes from ‘curd-pale’ to ‘crumbling’ to ‘climbing’, as it is emptied of poeticisms the better to stand starkly symbolic. Perhaps these revisions inspired a bitter love poem that insisted itself on me and made me reread it again and again recently – with some of its language stripped astonishingly bare (it was written the same year as ‘Sailing to Byzantium’, in 1926) it reads almost like a brutal folk tale, and the coldness and frenzy and longing of it seems properly lunatic.

First Love

Though nutured like the sailing moon
In beauty’s murderous brood,
She walked awhile and blushed awhile
And on my pathway stood
Until I thought her body bore
A heart of flesh and blood.

But since I laid a hand thereon
And found a heart of stone
I have attempted many things
And not a thing is done,
For every hand is lunatic
That travels on the moon.

She smiled and that transfigured me
And left me but a lout,
Maundering here, and maundering there,
Emptier of thought
Than the heavenly circuit of its stars
When the moon sails out.

(from ‘A Man Young and Old’, The Tower 1928)

Just say no

•October 25, 2011 • Leave a Comment

We interrupt these whimsical literary musings with a non-party political broadcast..

 Come on Ireland, just say NO! Presidential candidate Sean Gallagher is a man who

a) in 2009 gave himself an illegal tax-evading interest-free loan of €82, 829 from his public speaking company to his personal account. His accountants noticed and informed him he was breaking the law. He now claims this was an accidental clerical error. This is either corrupt or a matter of the most enormous incompetence (the loan was worth 70% of the company).

b) claimed that he with his cable expertise company, subcontractors of big property developers, to have created 100 jobs. He admitted yesterday that in the downturn he had to get rid of 80 people. That’s 20 jobs then Sean. Hardly Microsoft. And having been sacked twice yourself you’ll know tough it is. Let’s bring this entrepreneurial spirit to the Aras.

c) boasted in January 2009 of ‘a long record of involvement and commitment to Fianna Fail over the past 30 years’. Nothing wrong with this, except then to serve on the National Executive of Fianna Fail for two years, resigning in January 2011, and then to run as an ‘independent’ presidential candidate 5 months later following the March election meltdown is hardly credible. The same January 2009 letter remembers ‘I first served on the National Executive with Charlie Haughey in 1985-1987’, and notes his work as Political Secretary to Rory O’Hanlon as Fianna Fail Minister for Health and Minister for the Environment, and as a ‘full time’ fundraiser for the party ‘in Fianna Fail headquarters’. These are not the actions of a ‘grass-roots’ member, which he claims to be.

d) lied yesterday on live television.  He claimed he did not organise and personally collect donations for a 2008 Fianna Fail fundraiser. He did. Under closer questioning he then panicked, and eventually backtracked. He was forced to admit driving to a house to drop off photographs of the event. He still denied accepting there a €5000 donation. Under further pressure he admitted he might have taken a brown envelope. Ye Gods. It seems the businessman involved was also a convicted criminal.

It doesn’t matter who people vote for but surely, surely no voting  preferences should go to this man. From his own testimony he is a liar, a crook, and an ‘independent’ candidate who is fact an influential executive and fundraiser for a corrupt political party whose decisions condemned Ireland to economic armageddon.

Here are reputable printed sources for a) the illegal loan

c) the Fianna Fail connection

d) the €5000 donation

For b) visit here

and for all of these stories here’s a link to the RTE Frontline Presidential debate

Remember Zammo, Ireland. Just say no. Don’t listen don’t listen to anyone else. All you gotta do is be yourself.

Cats are not to be depinded on

•October 11, 2011 • Leave a Comment

W.B.Yeats spent much of the late 1880s writing to the poet Kathleen Tynan, praising her work, offering her advice, correcting the rhythms of her poems. Part of this was justifying (to himself as to her) his living with his family in ‘hateful London’ with its miserable poor, offensively rich, and literary men without convictions. His letters though describe his own precocious convictions beautifully, and an increasing attraction towards the whirl. Occasionally he was able to leave and consider his tenacious imaginative hold on the Irish west, and what it meant to him and to his writing, as in this lively letter. There is some of the strain of self-presentation here, but I see nothing of the cynicism he has latterly been accused of. He was also, as it happens, the most vibrant and unexpected of letter writers, always a pleasure to go back to:

to Katherine Tynan [13 Aug 1887]

Rosses Point, Sligo

You will see by the top of this letter that I am down at Sligo. I reached here Thursday morning about 2 oc having come by Liverpool but will return by Dublin perhaps.

Have been making a search for people to tell me fairy stories and found one or two. […] It is a wonderfully beautiful day the air is full of trembling light. The very feel of the familiar Sligo earth puts me in good spirits. I should like to live here always not out of liking for the people so much as for the earth and the sky here, though I like the people too. I went to see yesterday a certain cobler of my acquaintance and he discoursed over his cat as though he had walked out of one of Kickhams novels “Cats are not to be depinded upon” he said and told me how a neighbours cat had gone up the evening before to the top of a tree where a blackbird used to sing every night “and pulled him down” and then he finished sadly with “cats are not to be depinded upon”. [ here follows some found verses and other stories…]

Your Friend

W B Yeats

PS […] How does your article go on? I wish it were an Irish article, though at the comencement one I supose cannot chose ones own subjects always; but remember by being as Irish as you can you will be the more origonal and true to your self and in the long run more interesting even to English readers.

I am going now to a farm house where they have promised me fairy tales so I can write no more.

W.B.Yeats and the Arts

•August 23, 2011 • Leave a Comment
 
W.B.Yeats and the Arts begins on Friday 26th August at 12 noon.
 
See http://echoforum.wordpress.comfor more details.  
 

Yeats & the Arts

•July 20, 2011 • Leave a Comment

I am pleased to announce in association with ECHO, an international interdisplinary symposium on Yeats and the Arts, taking place at the Moore Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway.  Only €50 (€40) for two days – and free to members of NUI Galway.

See the ECHO website for more details, or contact adrianpaterson@yahoo.com , or thomas.walker@ell.ox.ac.uk

Masterful

•June 15, 2011 • Leave a Comment

C.P.Snow. The Masters. 1951. (London: Penguin Books, 1956) 312pp.

Sixty years old, this – well, the only word is masterful – book on psychology and power relations has still to be bettered. It looks and smells all of its sixty years, the atmosphere and trappings seeming to savour of ambered wines and musty times past, the Cambridge college in which it is set cocooned in the opening’s deadening snow – and my paperback copy has long loosened its hold on itself – but its taste is crisp, clear, contemporary. In fact it describes a time of change, new money beginning to shift the college on its axis and anticipating future developments by remembering its past evolution. More than this, it describes so well things that do not change, the thoughts of men, their pride, ambitions, their subtleties, manoeuvrings, and self-deceptions, and in its swift sentences layering tension and suspicion contains more hard clear gems of human insight than barrowloads of contemporary psychological fiction. I say men – the focus is on men, the dying Master of a college, and his thirteen colleagues who must gather to elect a new leader. If this sounds dull, nothing could be less so. They are observed absorbed in action, in feeling and testing and using their influence, in trying their power, their strength, their allegiances, facing their own vanities and humiliations, in defeat, death, and annihilation. Women are actors too, it must be said, although as wives and loves far from alone centre stage, and they like all the people here are glimpsed in movement or helpless stasis as the clock ticks towards the election’s resolution. In short, this is politics writ naked, but instrumentally, cunningly, beautifully dissected. C.P.Snow himself was a molecular physicist, but had a good war: he became involved in the Civil Service selecting of scientific personnel, and his judgements of personality were tested in white heat. His narrator thus exacts an expert scrutiny on men judging and being judged, and finds unpredictability in the dullest, predictability in the most imaginative. The book should not therefore only be read by disillusioned university lecturers, though it describes better than almost anywhere I’ve seen the thirst for knowledge and the drying of its streams, and better than anywhere the politics of university living, the mutual suspicion of the arts and sciences, the pressure of both under dwindling resources. Its level dryness can make brief quotation from it seem, summary, spare, even unconvincing; yet in so squarely building its effects one detail or sentence can drop us with sickening suddenness through a hole in the human heart. The compassion, grief, and vulnerabilities glimpsed beneath the surface means the novel by no means lacks an emotional centre. It opens to view all the things, in other words, that matter to people in the world. Within its small canvas it is one of the wisest and most moving novels imaginable, and like the best realist fiction a living, dying world in miniature.

The moon and then the Pleiades

•March 25, 2011 • Leave a Comment

In honour of one of the largest moons in recent times I thought to post one of the smallest moon poems of all times…

Tonight I’ve watched

The moon and then
the Pleiades
go down

The night is now
half-gone; youth
goes; I am

in bed alone

Sappho (trans. Mary Barnard)

(Apparently several editors have denied this is by Sappho but then they fail to say who else might have written it..)

Prayer before birth

•February 20, 2011 • Leave a Comment

Prayer before birth

I am not yet born; O hear me.
Let not the bloodsucking bat or the rat or the stoat or the
club-footed ghoul come near me.

I am not yet born, console me.
I fear that the human race may with tall walls wall me,
with strong drugs dope me, with wise lies lure me,
on black racks rack me, in blood-baths roll me.

I am not yet born; provide me
With water to dandle me, grass to grow for me, trees to talk
to me, sky to sing to me, birds and a white light
in the back of my mind to guide me.

I am not yet born; forgive me
For the sins that in me the world shall commit, my words
when they speak me, my thoughts when they think me,
my treason engendered by traitors beyond me,
my life when they murder by means of my
hands, my death when they live me.

I am not yet born; rehearse me
In the parts I must play and the cues I must take when
old men lecture me, bureaucrats hector me, mountains
frown at me, lovers laugh at me, the white
waves call me to folly and the desert calls
me to doom and the beggar refuses
my gift and my children curse me.

I am not yet born; O hear me,
Let not the man who is beast or who thinks he is God
come near me.

I am not yet born; O fill me
With strength against those who would freeze my
humanity, would dragoon me into a lethal automaton,
would make me a cog in a machine, a thing with
one face, a thing, and against all those
who would dissipate my entirety, would
blow me like thistledown hither and
thither or hither and thither
like water held in the
hands would spill me.

Let them not make me a stone and let them not spill me.
Otherwise kill me.

Louis MacNeice

Eclipse

•February 13, 2011 • Leave a Comment

Long past time for another moon poem, I think, and having missed the recent eclipse, here is an anti-eclipse versicle from Ben Jonson, who entreats the earth not to shadow something so ‘excellently bright’.  This is a poem that thus carefully enweaves astronomy with mythology:

 Hymn to Diana

Queen and Huntress, chaste and fair,
Now the sun is laid to sleep,
Seated in thy silver chair
State in wonted manner keep:
Hesperus entreats thy light,
Goddess excellently bright.

Earth, let not they envious shade
Dare itself to interpose;
Cynthia’s shining orb was made
Heaven to clear when day did close:
Bless us then with wishéd sight,
Goddess excellently bright.

Lay thy bow of pearl apart
And thy crystal-shining quiver;
Give unto the flying hart
Space to breathe, how short soever:
Thou that mak’st a day of night,
Goddess excellently bright!